Some Remarks on the Alleged Fall of Senmut
Abstract
Walter Federn's interests in Egyptology were manifold, and his knowledge of the discipline was encyclopaedic. He was interested in everything conceivable, but particularly in irreconcilable problems. Each time that I would send him a reprint of an article, I would receive from him after several months a lengthy, learned, and detailed commentary, questioning, discussing, sometimes approving, and sometimes disagreeing with my conclusions. These commentaries were never superficial, and never failed to impress me with his range of scholarly knowledge and his keen insights into whatever problems might be involved. For him, an unsolved problem, or a paradox, was a failure, and he never stopped working on one until a plausible solution could be found. The subject of the following remarks involves precisely the sorts of problems which Walter Federn relished. It is dedicated to his memory with fond affection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schulman maintains that the erasure of both names and images distinguishes damnatio memoriae from usurpation.
“Some scholars, such as Alan Schulman (Schulman 1969(Schulman -1970, p. 37), p. 37), maintain that this phenomenon-the erasure of both names and images-distinguishes damnatio memoriae from usurpation.”
From Killing Pharaohs in Exodus: The Anonymity of the Egyptian Kings, the Deconstruction of Their Individuality, and the Egyptian Practice of Damnatio Memoriae (2023) · cites this paper as Schulman 1969
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Schulman, A. R.
- Corresponding author
- Schulman, Alan R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1969
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 29
- ISSN
- 0065-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323746679
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- ancient Egyptian queens, ancient Egyptian queenship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review