Cited by 31Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisSoil and Environmental Studies

Mudbrick typology, sources, and sedimentological composition: A case study from Tell el-Muqdam, Egyptian Delta

Morgenstein, Maury E., Redmount, Carol A.·1998·Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt

Abstract

Maury E. Morgenstein, Carol A. Redmount, Mudbrick Typology, Sources, and Sedimentological Composition: A Case Study from Tell el-Muqdam, Egyptian Delta, Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt, Vol. 35 (1998), pp. 129-146

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/40000466

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgenstein, M. E., & Redmount, C. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1998
Volume
35
Pages
129
ISSN
0065-9991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325892156
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
adobe, Egyptian Delta, ancient Egypt, building materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review