The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time
Abstract
THE END OF POVERTY: Economic Possibilities for Our Time Jeffrey D. Sachs, foreword by Bono New York: Penguin Press, 2005. xvii, 397pp, $40.00 doth (ISBN 1-59420-045-9)The title of this book is a bit misleading. It does not propose a strategy to end poverty, but instead to end extreme poverty in Africa. There is extreme poverty elsewhere in the third world, principally in South Asia, but most countries outside of Africa, even in South Asia, have gotten a foothold on the ladder of development and are beginning to climb, on their own, out of extreme poverty. Africa, Sachs contends, is a special case. It cannot even get onto the bottommost rung of the development ladder because it is caught in a poverty trap from which it cannot escape without a substantial increase in the level of foreign assistance it receives from the rich countries of the world.Jeffrey Sachs is not the to write a popular book to persuade governments and the public at large in rich countries to increase the level of aid they give to poor countries on the grounds that it is not only the right thing to do, but also in their own national interest. Forty-five years ago, W.W. Rostow published his famous The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, which had the same aim and a very similar line of argument. Rostow, like Sachs, argued that developing countries were caught in a poverty trap, from which they could not escape without a significant increase in foreign aid. Rostow, like Sachs, argued that if the required levels of foreign aid were forthcoming, developing countries would be able to take off into self-sustained growth, or as Sachs puts it, they would be able to get a first foothold on the ladder of development. Rostow argued that it was in rich countries' own national interest to help the poor attain self-sustained growth because this was the best strategy for preventing the spread of communism to the third world. Sachs argues that ending extreme poverty is an essential part of an effective strategy to defeat international terrorism: we need to address the deeper roots of terrorism in societies that are not part of global prosperity, that are marginalized in the world economy, that are bereft of hope, and that are misused and abused by the rich world, as have been the oil states of the Middle East (216).In the 1960s, levels of foreign aid to developing countries did in fact increase, but nowhere near what was advocated as the minimum required for self-sustained growth in developing countries. In spite of this, over the past 40 years, most developing countries have, in fact, achieved sustained economic growth. As Sachs explains, in 1960 upwards of five-sixth of the world's population lived in extreme poverty-today the share is about onesixth, or approximately 1.5 billion people, mainly in South Asia and Africa. How did developing countries accounting for about two-thirds of world population manage to escape the poverty trap and get a foothold on the ladder of development without large amounts of foreign assistance? The answer can only be that they were not trapped in poverty in the place, but instead were victims, in large part, of their own misguided and inappropriate policies. In one country after another, economic policy reforms have brought about a rapid acceleration of economic growth and rising prosperity. Nowhere is this more evident that in the experiences of China and India, which are nicely summarized in chapters eight and nine, respectively.The one part of the world where economic growth has not accelerated-and in fact has decelerated-is Africa. In Africa, unlike South Asia, the absolute number and population share of people living in extreme poverty are rising. Is this because African countries have not implemented, or have not been successful in implementing, economic reforms comparable to those that have succeeded elsewhere in the world, perhaps because of poor governance, corruption, or other problems of their own making? …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda
George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x · Cited by 909
Free Distribution or Cost-Sharing? Evidence from a Randomized Malaria Prevention Experiment*
Cohen, J., & Dupas, P. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.1 · Cited by 762
Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity
Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002 · Cited by 729
Does progress towards universal health coverage improve population health?
Moreno-Serra, R., & Smith, P. C. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61039-3 · Cited by 636
Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps
Robertson, B. A., Rehage, J. S., & Sih, A. (2013) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.004 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Riedel, J., & Sachs, J. D.
- Venue
- International Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 849
- ISSN
- 0020-7020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2259389627
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/40204067
- The paper
- Riedel, J., & Sachs, J. D. (2005). The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. International Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/40204067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.