The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Professional values and ethics as defined by “the LIS discipline”
Abstract
The library and information science literature suggests a growing theoretical congruence in professional values and ethics. These values and ethics may be interpreted and applied in a variety of ways and through a variety of institutions. The library and information science (LIS) community has perhaps not been as responsive as it might be to these issues. LIS educators should first seek to identify the scope of the issues and then help students engage in what may become one of the more controversial domains of our time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Koehler (2003) reports findings of a survey of ethical values of 1893 librarians around the globe that indicate similar values ranking.”
From A global perspective on library association codes of ethics (2005) · cites this paper as Koehler (2003)
In the citing paper
“Again, this survey, although international in scope was dominated by librarians from English-speaking countries.”
From A global perspective on library association codes of ethics (2005) · cites this paper as Koehler (2003)
Citations
Cited by
A global perspective on library association codes of ethics
Shachaf, P. (2005) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.008 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Koehler, W.
- Affiliations
- Valdosta State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Koehler, Wallace
- Venue
- Journal of Education for Library and Information Science
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99
- ISSN
- 0748-5786 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W52151512
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- professional values, professional ethics, library and information science education, professional identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
