Sexual Rights: Concepts and Action
Abstract
Over the course of the past decade, the intersection between sexuality and health has become a central focus of attention for researchers and activists from a range of diverse fields. Scientific disciplines and social movements that, until quite recently, might well have seemed to have little in common with one another, have increasingly merged in seeking to address the complex range of questions that have linked sexuality to health in the late twentieth century. Yet in spite of intense research and activism in recent years, we have nonetheless largely failed to develop a more coherent framework for thought and action capable of resolving such questions-and this failure has been linked in important ways to our inability to develop a concept of sexual rights capable of serving as the cornerstone for a more progressive, global response to the relationship between sexuality and health. This paper briefly discusses the key challenge that currently confronts work on sexual rights. I begin by examining the complex intersections among a number of diverse fields that converge around questions related to sexual rights-and around the relationship between sexual rights and sexual health. Then I discuss the apparent difficulties encountered in seeking to elaborate a positive and empowering conception of sexual rights capable of providing a point of departure for the work carried out across such diverse fields. And finally, I would like to briefly suggest how such a conception, should we manage to build it in the future, might enable us to develop a coalition capable of working together both locally and globally not only against sexual violence, but in favor of sexual diversity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social mobilization for sexual rights and against patriarchal and fundamentalist socio-cultural norms can be traced back to feminist and gay rights movements of the 1960s, although the term itself was almost never used until the mid-1990s.
“Social mobilization for 'sexual rights' and against patriarchal and fundamentalist socio-cultural norms can be traced back to feminist and gay rights movements of the 1960s, although the term itself was almost never used until the mid-1990s (Parker, 1997(Parker, , 2000;;Petchesky, 2000).”
From From global discourse to local action: the makings of a sexual rights movement? (2006) · cites this paper as Parker, 1997
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 3 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Parker, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Brazilian Interdisciplinary AIDS Association (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Parker, Richard G.
- Venue
- Health and Human Rights
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 31
- ISSN
- 1079-0969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2441343746
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 4.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health and Human Rights (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- sexual rights, sexual health, sexuality and health, sexual violence, sexual diversity, conceptual framework, social movements, human rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review