Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measurement of Territory and Home Range Size in Birds

Open access
Odum, Eugene P., Kuenzler, Edward J.·1955·The Auk

Abstract

A•r some time during the annual cycle, most vertebrates restrict their activities to a definite area which may be termed the home range.If all or part of the home range is defended against other individuals of the same species, the guarded area is called a territory, according to current usage.Territoriality is an important mechanism which reduces intraspecific competition; it is especially pronounced in nest-building animals (birds, certain fish, insects, etc.) which have complicated behavior patterns requiring highly co6rdinated actions during reproductive periods.Establishment of territories and home ranges produces characteristic intrapopulation distribution patterns which have important bearing on the choice of census methods (See Odum, 1953, Chap.6).Examination of the voluminous literature on territorialism in birds reveals that many qualitative details have been worked out.The "kinds" of territory, such as are listed in the comprehensive review by Nice (1941), have been classified, and the means of establishment and defense of the territory area have been described for many species.On the other hand, many quantitative aspects of territorialism have been scarcely considered.For example, the effect of various populations and habitat factors on the size and configuration of the defended or occupied areas is virtually unknown.A relation between territory size and food supply is often postulated, but we know of no case where the available food supply and the size of territory have both been accurately measured.It is true that numerous estimates made of territory size have been published, but it is evident that many are but crude approximations, often based on less than a dozen spot observations.Very little confidence can be placed in the comparison of measurements made by different investigators because of the great variation in procedures used and in the intensivehess of the observation.It is becoming quite evident that quantitative comparisons of territoriality cannot proceed until sound, consistent methods of measurement are developed.In this paper the problem of measurements of territory and home range size is critically examined, and a method for standardizing measurements is proposed.The method is illustrated by data obtained in a study of territoriality of seven southeastern species.These data are also used to test certain concepts developed by mammalogists in their parallel studies of home range.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/4081419

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Odum, E. P., & Kuenzler, E. J.
Venue
The Auk
Published
1955-04
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
128-137
ISSN
  • 0004-8038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-4254
OpenAlex
W2327667669
Cited by
531
References
3
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Territory and Home Range Size in Birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/4081419
The paper
Odum, E. P., & Kuenzler, E. J. (1955). Measurement of Territory and Home Range Size in Birds. The Auk. https://doi.org/10.2307/4081419

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.