The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement of Territory and Home Range Size in Birds
Open accessAbstract
A•r some time during the annual cycle, most vertebrates restrict their activities to a definite area which may be termed the home range.If all or part of the home range is defended against other individuals of the same species, the guarded area is called a territory, according to current usage.Territoriality is an important mechanism which reduces intraspecific competition; it is especially pronounced in nest-building animals (birds, certain fish, insects, etc.) which have complicated behavior patterns requiring highly co6rdinated actions during reproductive periods.Establishment of territories and home ranges produces characteristic intrapopulation distribution patterns which have important bearing on the choice of census methods (See Odum, 1953, Chap.6).Examination of the voluminous literature on territorialism in birds reveals that many qualitative details have been worked out.The "kinds" of territory, such as are listed in the comprehensive review by Nice (1941), have been classified, and the means of establishment and defense of the territory area have been described for many species.On the other hand, many quantitative aspects of territorialism have been scarcely considered.For example, the effect of various populations and habitat factors on the size and configuration of the defended or occupied areas is virtually unknown.A relation between territory size and food supply is often postulated, but we know of no case where the available food supply and the size of territory have both been accurately measured.It is true that numerous estimates made of territory size have been published, but it is evident that many are but crude approximations, often based on less than a dozen spot observations.Very little confidence can be placed in the comparison of measurements made by different investigators because of the great variation in procedures used and in the intensivehess of the observation.It is becoming quite evident that quantitative comparisons of territoriality cannot proceed until sound, consistent methods of measurement are developed.In this paper the problem of measurements of territory and home range size is critically examined, and a method for standardizing measurements is proposed.The method is illustrated by data obtained in a study of territoriality of seven southeastern species.These data are also used to test certain concepts developed by mammalogists in their parallel studies of home range.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calculation of Size of Home Range
Hayne, D. W. (1949) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1375189 · Cited by 874
The Role of Territory in Bird Life
Nice, M. M. (1941) · American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.2307/2420732 · Cited by 338
Cain, S. A. (1938) · The American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.2307/2420468 · Cited by 255
Cited by
The Evolution of Diversity in Avian Territorial Systems
Brown, J. L. (1964) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.16226357 · Cited by 1,121
The Social Organization of Tigers (Panthera Tigris) in Royal Chitawan National Park, Nepal
Sunquist, M. E. (1981) · Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology · doi:10.5479/si.00810282.336 · Cited by 337
Temporal Habitat Partitioning and Spatial Use of Coyotes and Red Foxes in East-Central Illinois
Gosselink, T. E., Deelen, T. R. V., Warner, R. E., & Joselyn, M. G. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3803065 · Cited by 237
Walter, W. D., VerCauteren, K. C., Campa, H., Clark, W. R., Fischer, J. W., Hygnstrom, S. E., Mathews, N. E., Nielsen, C. K., Schauber, E. M., Van Deelen, T. R., et al. (2009) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9374-4 · Cited by 85
Harrington, K. J., Fahlbusch, J. A., Langrock, R., Therrien, J.-F., Houtz, J. L., & McDonald, B. I. (2020) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/s40317-020-00214-y · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Odum, E. P., & Kuenzler, E. J.
- Venue
- The Auk
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1955-04
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 128-137
- ISSN
- 0004-8038 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4254
- OpenAlex
- W2327667669
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Territory and Home Range Size in Birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/4081419
- The paper
- Odum, E. P., & Kuenzler, E. J. (1955). Measurement of Territory and Home Range Size in Birds. The Auk. https://doi.org/10.2307/4081419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.