Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice

Posner, Eric A., Vermeule, Adrian·2004·Harvard Law Review

Abstract

2 Although we focus on the Eastern European transitions after 1989, we will also draw upon material from the Southern European regime transitions of the mid-1970s and the Latin American transitions of the 1980s.For overviews of the latter two cases, see Linz, supra note 1. 3 Sanford Levinson makes a similar point about criticisms of truth commissions, which he fruitfully analyzes in light of the Supreme Court's due process jurisprudence.See Sanford Levinson, "Trials, Commissions, and Investigating Committees: The Elusive Search for Norms of Due Process," in Truth vs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/4093461

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Posner, E. A., & Vermeule, A.
Venue
Harvard Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
2004-01
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
761
ISSN
0017-811X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1605578388
Cited by
347
References
0
FWCI
132.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/4093461
The paper
Posner, E. A., & Vermeule, A. (2004). Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice. Harvard Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/4093461

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.