The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English
Abstract
Thanks to the means available for speech analysis and synthesis, there is at present considerable knowledge of the acoustic differences whereby we distinguish among the various sounds of English. We know, for example, what the more important acoustic cues are by which listeners decide whether a stop sound is velar, alveolar, or bilabial. In the case of the stops, moreover, we know by and large what the acoustic differences are between the members of each of the homorganic pairs p-b, t-d and k-g (in other words, between the so-called voiced and voiceless stops). But we are as yet unable to state with any exactness the extent to which each of these acoustic differences separately affects our ability to discriminate between the two kinds of stops. Moreover, where progress has been made in this direction it is certainly in some measure due to the fact that we have dealt chiefly with the stops in those positions where the voiced-voiceless contrast is phonetically maximal, that is, in initial and final positions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Temporal processing in the aging auditory system
Strouse, A., Ashmead, D. H., Ohde, R. N., & Grantham, D. W. (1998) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.423748 · Cited by 401
Gao, J., & Arai, T. (2019) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100932 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Lisker, L.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1957-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2319608925
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/410949
- The paper
- Lisker, L. (1957). Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/410949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.