The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies
Open accessAbstract
Technological diversity in corporations is a driving force behind four major features of contemporary business: corporate growth; increasing R&D investment; increasing external linkage for new technologies by various means and opportunities to engage in technology-related new businesses. Corporate technological competencies are dispersed over a wider range of sectors than their production activities, and this range is increasing. Technologies are not the same as products arid must be dealt with differently. Increases in technological diversity in both companies and products challenge conventional wisdom and a number of widely accepted management concepts. This article challenges four of these notions: first, that for every company there exists a narrow set of core technological competencies on which the company should focus; second, that major new innovations are often associated with major "competence destruction;" third, that companies should not only downsize but disintegrate and out-source technological competencies just like production; and fourth, that companies should focus or specialize on a narrow set of core businesses. These notions do contain some truth, and they do apply in sonic companies in some periods of their life. However, as with any simple concept, they can be dangerous when carried to extremes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sectoral systems of innovation and production
Malerba, F. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00139-1 · Cited by 2,733
Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013 · Cited by 2,435
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094825 · Cited by 1,490
Self-citationGann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00114-1 · Cited by 1,315
Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 8-25
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2037196671
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 71.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41165908
- The paper
- Granstrand, O., Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.