Gaining from Green Management: Environmental Management Systems inside and outside the Factory
Abstract
Environmental Management Systems (EMSs) are relatively new and rather innovative management practices that provide firms with additional sources of information and leverage over their environmental and business processes and performance. This article reports the results of a survey of manufacturing plants that have adopted EMSs. It finds that EMSs are associated with factories that are larger, more committed to total quality management, and more innovative in general. EMSs are also a useful tool for managing community relationships and dealing with key stakeholder groups on potentially controversial environmental issues. Furthermore, EMS plants appear to pose less environmental risk for communities and report that their adoption and use of an EMS is an important factor in achieving this result. In the end, EMSs are an effective tool for managing environmental costs and risks inside and outside the factory in ways that add to, rather than detract from, the bottom-line.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employee participation results in enhanced effectiveness of environmental management systems thanks to more efficient resource usage.
“Employee participation results in the enhanced effectiveness of environmental management systems thanks to more efficient resource usage [76], limited wasteful practice [80], and reduced contamination [81].”
From Green Human Resource Management as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: Polish Young Company Experience (2018) · cites this paper as [76]
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mousa, S. K., & Othman, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118595 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability
Amrutha, V. N., & Geetha, S. N. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119131 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Yang, C.-S., Lu, C.-S., Haider, J. J., & Marlow, P. B. (2013) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.005 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2013) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1827 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Bombiak, E., & Marciniuk-Kluska, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061739 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
“Employee participation results in the enhanced effectiveness of environmental management systems thanks to more efficient resource usage [76], limited wasteful practice [80], and reduced contamination [81].”
BackgroundTian, Q., Liu, Y., & Fan, J. (2015) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2015.14 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Masudin, I., Wastono, T., & Zulfikarijah, F. (2018) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2018.1485212 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Florida, R., & Davison, D.
- ORCID
- Florida, Richard
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 64-84
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2075138567
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 19.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- California Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Keywords
- environmental management systems, green management, factories, total quality management, organizational innovation, community relations, stakeholder management, environmental risk, environmental costs, firm size, environmental performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review