The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beyond Valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT Project Management
Abstract
Real options can be a powerful tool for quantifying the value of strategic and operational flexibility associated with uncertain IT investments. However, they also constitute a new way of thinking about how projects can be organized and managed to maximize upside potential while minimizing downside risk. This article explains how practitioners can incorporate options thinking into contemporary IT project management. Options thinking means recognizing real options and how they add value. Just as important is managing projects so that the option value that exists in theory is realized in practice. Several real-world examples illustrate how the value of embedded real options can be realized through active project management. There are pitfalls associated with each option, as well as benefits and limitations of different approaches to valuing options. Organizations must decide whether to undertake the challenges of adopting options thinking as a project management philosophy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sharma, R., Mithas, S., & Kankanhalli, A. (2014) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.17 · Cited by 516
A Longitudinal Examination of Enterprise Resource Planning System Post-Implementation Enhancements
Cao, J., Nicolaou, A. I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2013) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-50398 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Fichman, R. G., Keil, M., & Tiwana, A.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 74-96
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2046485078
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond Valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT Project Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41166296
- The paper
- Fichman, R. G., Keil, M., & Tiwana, A. (2005). Beyond Valuation: “Options Thinking” in IT Project Management. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.