The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovation in Megaprojects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5
Abstract
Megaprojects require investment of $1bn or more to build infrastructure, usually involving a complex system of production consisting of discrete, routine, and highvolume repetitive processes. Many of these processes can be progressively standardized and replicated to improve overall productive performance. This article presents the findings of research on design and production of London's Heathrow Airport Terminal 5 (T5). The findings were used to develop a conceptual framework—which we call the systems integration model—to identify the project and operational processes that contribute to success in delivering megaprojects. The systems integrator is the lead organization in a megaproject, responsible for establishing a governance structure, managing risk, and coordinating processes performed by a large network of external suppliers. Innovations based on the recombination and replication of processes can be introduced to improve megaproject performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 1×
“See Paul S. Adler and Kim B. Clark, “Behind the Learning Curve: A Sketch of the Learning Process,” Management Science, 37/3 (March 1991): 267-281.”
Background
Cited by
The front-end of projects: a systematic literature review and structuring
Williams, T., Vo, H., Samset, K., & Edkins, A. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1594429 · Cited by 145
Moving goals and governance in megaprojects
Bourne, M., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., & Pesämaa, O. (2023) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102486 · Cited by 41
The dynamics of systems integration: Balancing stability and change on London's Crossrail project
Muruganandan, K., Davies, A., Denicol, J., & Whyte, J. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.007 · Cited by 36
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davies, A., Gann, D., & Douglas, T.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-125
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W1968390870
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovation in Megaprojects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41166482
- The paper
- Davies, A., Gann, D., & Douglas, T. (2009). Innovation in Megaprojects: Systems Integration at London Heathrow Terminal 5. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.