Cited by 207Critical Race Theory in EducationGlobal Education and MulticulturalismIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Troubling National Discourses in Anti-Racist Curricular Planning

Open access
Schick, Carol, Denis, Verna St.·2005·Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation

Abstract

The narrative of the Canadian prairie context is invested in intercultural relations that privilege whiteness and marginalize Aboriginal people and other racial minorities. We maintain that anti‐oppressive curriculum on the Canadian prairies must examine how racial identifications are constructed through commonplace national discourses. A curriculum that is anti‐oppressive needs to examine the production of racial identifications, including the construction of whiteness in a Canadian context, where racism often exists in denial. Without a critical race analysis, the “celebration of diversity” and other popular narratives have every possibility of reinforcing relations of domination. Key words: anti‐oppressive education, Aboriginal education, critical whiteness studies Les textes au sujet des Prairies canadiennes font surtout état de relations interculturelles qui privilégient les Blancs et marginalisent les peuples autochtones et les autres minorités ethnoculturelles. Selon les auteures, il faut analyser le mode de construction des identités ethnoculturelles à travers les discours nationaux très répandus. Un programme scolaire qui se veut antioppressif doit tenir compte du processus de production identitaire, notamment chez les eurocanadiens où le racisme existe souvent, même s’il est nié. Sans une analyse critique portant sur l’identité ethnoculturelle, la promotion de la diversité et les autres discours populaires risquent fort de renforcer les relations de domination. Mots…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/4126472

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Schick, C., & Denis, V. S.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation
Published
2005
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
295
ISSN
0380-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W98641243
Cited by
207
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
national discourse, whiteness, critical whiteness studies, Aboriginal education, intercultural relations, racial identity development, Euro-Canadians, Canadian prairies, ethnocultural identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review