The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence
Abstract
In Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa, Marcel Fafchamps synthesizes the results of recent surveys of indigenous market institutions in twelve countries, including Benin, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, and Zimbabwe, and presents findings about economics exchange in Africa that have implications both for future research and current policy. Employing empirical data as well as theoretical models that clarify the data, Fafchamps takes as his unifying principle the difficulties of contract enforcement. Arguing that in an unpredictable world contracts are not always likely to be respected, he shows that contract agreements in sub-Saharan Africa are affected by the absence of large hierarchies (both corporate and governmental) and as a result must depend to a greater degree than in more developed economies on social networks and personal trust. Fafchamps considers policy recommendations as they apply to countries in three different stages of development: countries with undeveloped market institutions, like Ghana; countries at an intermediate stage, like Kenya; and countries with developed market institutions, like Zimbabwe. Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa caps ten years of personal research by the author. Fafchamps, in collaboration with such institutions as the Africa Division of the World Bank and the International Food Policy Research Institute, participated in the surveys of manufacturing firms and agricultural traders that provide the empirical basis for the book. The result is a work that makes a significant contribution to research on the continuing economic stagnation of many countries in sub-Saharan Africa and is also largely accessible to researchers in other fields and policy professionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205105774431243 · Cited by 2,062
Agrifood Industry Transformation and Small Farmers in Developing Countries
Reardon, T., Barrett, C. B., Berdegué, J. A., & Swinnen, J. F. M. (2009) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.08.023 · Cited by 930
Smallholder Participation in Contract Farming: Comparative Evidence from Five Countries
Barrett, C. B., Bachke, M. E., Bellemare, M. F., Michelson, H. C., Narayanan, S., & Walker, T. F. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.006 · Cited by 730
The Future of Small Farms: New Directions for Services, Institutions, and Intermediation
Poulton, C., Dorward, A., & Kydd, J. (2010) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.009 · Cited by 543
Agri-food value chain revolutions in low- and middle-income countries
Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., Swinnen, J., & Zilberman, D. (2022) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20201539 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Bird, D., & Fafchamps, M.
- Venue
- The International Journal of African Historical Studies
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 382
- ISSN
- 0361-7882 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3148043649
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/4129030
- The paper
- Bird, D., & Fafchamps, M. (2004). Market Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theory and Evidence. The International Journal of African Historical Studies. https://doi.org/10.2307/4129030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.