The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For understanding the process of building and maintaining hegemony, two aspects seem particularly important: (1) the function of a historical bloc in production and (2) a certain degree of consent from the subaltern classes (Crehan 2002, 102).”
From Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe (2022) · cites this paper as Crehan 2002
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thinking with Gramsci Today: Gramscian perspectives in ethnographies of Europe
Streinzer, A., & Tosic, J. (2022) · Dialectical Anthropology · doi:10.1007/s10624-022-09679-0 · Cited by 9
Too much common sense, not enough critical thinking!
Patterson, T. C. (2016) · Dialectical Anthropology · doi:10.1007/s10624-016-9434-5 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Igoe, J., & Crehan, K.
- Venue
- The International Journal of African Historical Studies
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181
- ISSN
- 0361-7882
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review