The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Women, Men and Politeness
Abstract
Sex, politeness and language: Sex and language, What is politeness?, Why do women and men interact differently?, Analysing linguistic politeness, Social dimensions and linguistic analysis, Cross-cultural contrasts, What's in store Who speaks here? Interacting politely: Who's got the floor?, Who's asking questions?, Who's interrupting and why?, Back-channeling - a female speciality?, Agreeable and disagreeable responses, Conclusion Soft and low-hedges and boosters as politeness devices: Hedges and boosters, Hedges and boosters and 'women's language, Tag questions, Pragmatic particles- you know, I think, sort of, of course, The pragmatic tag eh, A prosodic hedge - the HRT, How typical are these politeness patterns?, Conclusion What a lovely tie! Compliments and positive politeness strategies: Paying compliments, Who pays most compliments?, How do women and men pay compliments?, What do women and men compliment each other about?, Can a compliment be a power play?, Compliment responses, What about other speech acts?, Conclusion Sorry! Apologies and negative politeness strategies: Why apologise?, Who apologises most, How do women and men apologise?, What deserves an apology?, Offending the boss is a serious matter, Friends and forgiveness, How do people respond to an apology?, Why apologise? Some answers, Speech acts and politeness - what next? Why politeness matters: Patterns of politeness, Being polite in class, Peer interaction in professional contexts, Strategies for change, Conclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Politeness Theory and Relational Work
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture · doi:10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9 · Cited by 1,382
Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791178 · Cited by 908
Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples
Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638530802073712 · Cited by 788
Gardner-Chloros, P. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609787 · Cited by 566
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00038-8 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Freed, A. F., & Holmes, J.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 395
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033852541
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 132.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Women, Men and Politeness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/416031
- The paper
- Freed, A. F., & Holmes, J. (1997). Women, Men and Politeness. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/416031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.