The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hedging in Scientific Research Articles
Abstract
This book provides a comprehensive study of hedging in academic research papers, relating a systematic analysis of forms to a pragmatic explanation for their use. Based on a detailed examination of journal articles and interviews with research scientists, the study shows that the extensive use of possibility and tentativeness in research writing is intimately connected to the social and institutional practices of academic communities and is at the heart of how knowledge comes to be socially accredited through texts. The study identifies the major forms, functions and distribution of hedges and explores the research article genre in detail to present an explanatory framework based on a complex social and ideological interpretive environment. The results show that hedging is central to Scientific argument, individual scientists and, ultimately, to science itself. The importance of hedging to student writers is also recognised and a chapter devoted to teaching implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00038-8 · Cited by 521
Self-citationTextual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?
Dahl, T. (2004) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004 · Cited by 433
Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles
HYLAND, K. (2001) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088301018004005 · Cited by 375
Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (. (2016) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088316650399 · Cited by 268
(2016) · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Piller, I., & Hyland, K.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 631
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028973272
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 211.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/417106
- The paper
- Piller, I., & Hyland, K. (1999). Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/417106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.