The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars
Abstract
This article examines crosslinguistic variation in FILLER-GAP DEPENDENCIES (WH-questions and relative clauses) from a processing perspective, and integrates research findings from psycholinguistics, language typology and generative grammar. Numerous implicational universals and hierarchies are proposed that receive a natural explanation in terms of processing and complexity. Filler-gap domains are complex in proportion to their size and in proportion to the amount of simultaneous syntactic and semantic processing that is required in addition to gap identification. They are simplified by making the gap easier to identify and process, or by avoiding a gap structure altogether. When grammatical variation is viewed from this perspective many descriptive insights and implicational patterns can be motivated that have either been stipulated or that have gone unnoticed hitherto. This approach provides an alternative to the assumption of innate parameterized subjacency constraints in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures
Chomsky, N. (1993) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110884166 · Cited by 8,541
Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection
Dowty, D. R. (1991) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1991.0021 · Cited by 4,480
Constraints on variables in syntax
Ross, J. R. (1967) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4,102
Head-driven phrase structure grammar
Sag, I. A., & Pollard, C. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,889
Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements
Greenberg, J. H. (1963) · Americanae (AECID Library) · Cited by 3,065
Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar.
Soames, S., Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I. (1989) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185122 · Cited by 1,829
The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations
Dryer, M. S. (1992) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1992.0028 · Cited by 1,323
The cognitive basis for linguistic structures1
Bever, T. G. (2013) · Language Down the Garden Path · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677139.003.0001 · Cited by 1,288
McCawley, N. A. (1976) · Language · doi:10.2307/413303 · Cited by 1,228
Cited by
Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars
Hawkins, J. A. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 · Cited by 1,743
Self-citationThe Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency
Hawkins, J. A. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664993.001.0001 · Cited by 405
Self-citationTHE EVOLVING CONTEXT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS
Bley-Vroman, R. (2009) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109090275 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkins, J. A.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071641904
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 26.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/417261
- The paper
- Hawkins, J. A. (1999). Processing Complexity and Filler-Gap Dependencies across Grammars. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/417261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
