The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rethinking Linguistic Relativity
Abstract
what's going on.I'm not sure you can ever have a Ja vanese response to Javanese art if you're not Javanese maybe you can if you spend ten years there, but you can't do it by watching a wayang show.So then there's the question of annotations, and trying to figure out how to get the real stuff across.There's a lot of concern about that.RH: You've written extensively on other conceptions of sel£hood, of personhood.A few minutes ago you used the phrase "seU-representation." Do you think that's what they're up to?CG: In that case, not individually, but yes-they're in terested in the representation of Indonesia as a collective self.RH: Do they think of it in those terms?CG: Yes, explicitly.That's what it's all about.They want to establish in foreign eyes, and also in their own, an "fficial cultural identity.RH: Is the desire to have an official cultural identity something that is absorbed from Western ways of thinking?CG: I suppose to some degree it is, but it's very alive in Indonesia, because there's now a civil religion called Pancasila which is an attempt to do exactly that-to create a rather Javanized version of an all-Indonesian culture.There have been debates about this going back to the 1920S and 1930S, between extreme traditional ists-that the new Indonesia should be represented in terms of 2,000 years of tradition-and extreme cosmo politans-who want to join the world of modem socie ties as quickly as possible.That debate continues.Java, of course, has had a couple hundred years of colonialism, more than most places have.For the Outer Islands it's a bit less.The trouble is that there isn't one thing that they all go back to.Some Javanese would like to go back to Majapahit, but the Sumatrans are not too happy about that idea!
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction
Goodwin, C. (2000) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x · Cited by 3,073
Ahearn, L. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 · Cited by 2,083
The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015) · University of Texas at Austin · doi:10.15781/t25p41 · Cited by 1,674
An Introduction to Discourse Analysis
Gee, J. P. (2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203005675 · Cited by 650
Metadata
- Authors
- Brody, J., Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 638
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334905547
- Cited by
- 868
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/417805
- The paper
- Brody, J., Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (1998). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/417805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.