The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Survival of Roman Antiquities in the Middle Ages
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From a more pragmatic point of view, it underlines the advantage of reusing ready-made materials in comparison to the production of new blocks [29].”
From Fundamentals of Building Deconstruction as a Circular Economy Strategy for the Reuse of Construction Materials (2021) · cites this paper as [29]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bertino, G., Kisser, J., Zeilinger, J., Langergraber, G., Fischer, T., & Österreicher, D. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11030939 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Natunewicz, C. F., & Greenhalgh, M.
- Venue
- The Classical World
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 314
- ISSN
- 0009-8418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W608042254
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Classical World (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Religious Studies of Rome
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- Roman antiquities, medieval reception of antiquity, medieval archaeology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
