The incidence of influenza among persons of different economic status during the epidemic of 1918
Abstract
Edgar Sydenstricker (1881–1936) worked in several capacities for the U.S. Public Health Service from 1915 until his death in 1936. Although his formal education was in economics, he served as a statistician and survey designer and manager. He authored or co-authored more than 100 papers and publications, and components of several reports and analyses of public health issues of the time can also be credited to his pen. Today, Sydenstricker’s work is only occasionally cited by researchers and authors exploring various aspects of public health. Many of the survey and analysis techniques he pioneered have become routine methods in epidemiology and public health. Sydenstricker was influential in moving public health from a purely mortality-based data and analysis system to a system that captured socioeconomic status, morbidity, and personal status in addition to the then-traditional way of examining populations. He innovated. Most commentators on Sydenstricker’s contributions focus on his work in interweaving socioeconomic status into public health thinking. While his work is most often observed for its political meaning, Sydenstricker’s approaches should be characterized in a more general manner that reflects his true prescience in public health. Examination of his work shows that the commentators reached reasonable conclusions about its social applicability. The true influence of his contributions, however, becomes clear through a less political perspective. When assessed in mor…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the 1918 Spanish influenza epidemic in America, incidence was significantly higher among the working classes.
“In 1931, Edgar Sydenstricker outlined inequalities by socio-economic class in the 1918 Spanish influenza epidemic in America, reporting a significantly higher incidence among the working classes.”
From The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 4 · Cited by 117
- Authors
- Sydenstricker, E.
- Corresponding author
- Sydenstricker, Edgar
- Venue
- Public Health Reports (1896-1970)
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1931
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 154
- ISSN
- 0094-6214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2181565662
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Health Reports (1896-1970) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
- Keywords
- influenza, 1918 influenza pandemic, socioeconomic status, economic status, social determinants of health, public health statistics, social security, evidence-based public health, history of public health, public health policy
- MeSH terms
- Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Influenza, Human, Social Class, United States, History, 20th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review