Cited by 117Influenza Virus Research StudiesHistorical and modern epidemiology studiesHistory of Medicine and Tropical Health

The incidence of influenza among persons of different economic status during the epidemic of 1918

Sydenstricker, Edgar·1931·Public Health Reports (1896-1970)

Abstract

Edgar Sydenstricker (1881–1936) worked in several capacities for the U.S. Public Health Service from 1915 until his death in 1936. Although his formal education was in economics, he served as a statistician and survey designer and manager. He authored or co-authored more than 100 papers and publications, and components of several reports and analyses of public health issues of the time can also be credited to his pen. Today, Sydenstricker’s work is only occasionally cited by researchers and authors exploring various aspects of public health. Many of the survey and analysis techniques he pioneered have become routine methods in epidemiology and public health. Sydenstricker was influential in moving public health from a purely mortality-based data and analysis system to a system that captured socioeconomic status, morbidity, and personal status in addition to the then-traditional way of examining populations. He innovated. Most commentators on Sydenstricker’s contributions focus on his work in interweaving socioeconomic status into public health thinking. While his work is most often observed for its political meaning, Sydenstricker’s approaches should be characterized in a more general manner that reflects his true prescience in public health. Examination of his work shows that the commentators reached reasonable conclusions about its social applicability. The true influence of his contributions, however, becomes clear through a less political perspective. When assessed in mor…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/4579923

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the 1918 Spanish influenza epidemic in America, incidence was significantly higher among the working classes.

    “In 1931, Edgar Sydenstricker outlined inequalities by socio-economic class in the 1918 Spanish influenza epidemic in America, reporting a significantly higher incidence among the working classes.”

    From The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 4 · Cited by 117

Authors
Sydenstricker, E.
Corresponding author
Sydenstricker, Edgar
Venue
Public Health Reports (1896-1970)
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1931
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
154
ISSN
0094-6214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2181565662
Cited by
117
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health Reports (1896-1970) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
Keywords
influenza, 1918 influenza pandemic, socioeconomic status, economic status, social determinants of health, public health statistics, social security, evidence-based public health, history of public health, public health policy
MeSH terms
Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Influenza, Human, Social Class, United States, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review