The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relationships between Beech (Nothofagus Sp.) Seedfall and Populations of Mice (Mus musculus), and the Demographic and Dietary Responses of Stoats (Mustela erminea), in Three New Zealand Forests
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Even exposure to low doses of ARs results in subtle behavioural and pathological changes, and such animals can be weakened in the long term and have slower responses, and are thus more susceptible to ac cidents, predation, and infection (King, 1983; Fournier-Chambrillon et al., 2004; Brakes and Smith, 2005).”
From Exposure assessment of anticoagulant rodenticides in the liver of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Slovenia (2024) · cites this paper as King, 1983
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cerkvenik-Flajs, V., Schenke, D., Žele-Vengušt, D., Korenjak-Černe, S., Perpar, A., & Vengušt, G. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170400 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- King, C. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141
- ISSN
- 0021-8790
- DOI
- 10.2307/4593
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationships between Beech (Nothofagus Sp.) Seedfall and Populations of Mice (Mus musculus), and the Demographic and Dietary Responses of Stoats (Mustela erminea), in Three New Zealand Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/4593
- The paper
- King, C. M. (1983). The Relationships between Beech (Nothofagus Sp.) Seedfall and Populations of Mice (Mus musculus), and the Demographic and Dietary Responses of Stoats (Mustela erminea), in Three New Zealand Forests. The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/4593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
