Cited by 9Indigenous Cultures and HistoryColonialism, slavery, and tradeAmerican Environmental and Regional History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Fur Trade, Indian Land and the Need to Define Adequate "Environmental" Parameters

Thomas, Peter A.·1981·Ethnohistory

Abstract

There is an interpretation repeated frequently in historical studies of Northeastern Indian-White relations which emphasizes native over-exploitation of fur-bearing species and the encroachment of Europeans onto Indian horticultural lands as prime factors in the disintegration of Native American cultures. Was over-exploitation that significant in the collapse of the Indian-European trade? Was the incorporation of native lands into colonial towns of clear advantage only to White settlers? Data relating to the middle Connecticut River Valley, which cover the period from 1650 to 1670, indicate that a reinterpretation is needed. Social and political factors developed from ethnohistorical reconstruction clearly counter-balance the earlier emphasis on ecological constraints.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/481138

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, P. A.
Corresponding author
Thomas, Peter A.
Venue
Ethnohistory
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1981
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
359
ISSN
0014-1801 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319348686
Cited by
9
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnohistory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Environmental and Regional History
Keywords
fur trade, Native American-European relations, Indian lands, colonial settlement, Connecticut Valley, environmental history, Native American culture, colonial New England, 17th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Fur Trade, Indian Land and the Need to Define Adequate "Environmental" Parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/481138
The paper
Thomas, P. A. (1981). The Fur Trade, Indian Land and the Need to Define Adequate "Environmental" Parameters. Ethnohistory. https://doi.org/10.2307/481138