Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Folklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesIndigenous Cultures and HistoryCultural and Sociopolitical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Giant Beaver: A Prehistoric Memory?

Beck, Jane C.·1972·Ethnohistory

Abstract

An examination of the giant beaver tale among various northeastern Algonkian tribes (such as the Montagnais, Penobscot, Passamaquoddy, Micmac and Malecite) and a study of the nature and distribution of the Pleistocene giant beaver, Castoroides ohioensis, lead to the tentative conclusion that elements in these tales represent a kind of fossil memory of this long-extinct rodent.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/481746

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Beck, J. C.
Corresponding author
Beck, Jane C.
Venue
Ethnohistory
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1972
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
109
ISSN
0014-1801 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315332080
Cited by
5
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnohistory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Keywords
Pleistocene megafauna, oral tradition, folk tales, cultural hero, trickster, Innu, Penobscot, Passamaquoddy, MICMAC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.