The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nestling Weight and Survival in Individual Great Tits (Parus major)
Open accessAbstract
(1) The aim of this paper is to estimate the shape of the curve relating first year survival to nestling weight in individual great tits (Parus major) and to study the causality of this relationship. (2) Data were collected in a mainland and an island population. Nestlings were weighed and sexed in the nest when 2 weeks old. A recapture programme provided data for recapture-rate estimates in the winter. Local survival until next breeding season was estimated by capturing the breeding population. Brood-size manipulation experiments were performed in the mainland population in order to manipulate nestling weights. (3) The relation between local recapture rate and nestling weight was described using logistic regression techniques. The descriptive model included positive weight and negative squared weight regression coefficients, if controlled for year, sex and date. Recapture rate approached zero at weights of c. 70% of the adult body weight. The curves for both populations showed an approximately linear part over a rather long range of weights. At high weights, the curve levelled off in the mainland population and curved down in the island population. (4) Survival from weighing till fledging and recapture rate from fledging till winter were related to nestling weight, but recapture rate from winter till breeding was not. (5) The effect of brood-size manipulation on nestling weight and subsequent recapture rate suggests causality of the recapture rate-nestling weight curve. Additional information from a comparison of the association between recapture rate and nestling weight within and between broods leads to the conclusion that weight does play a causal role in this relationship. Recapture rate-nestling weight curves can thus be estimated from non-experimental data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Cited by
Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment
Dingemanse, N. J., Both, C., Drent, P. J., & Tinbergen, J. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2680 · Cited by 910
Self-citationRepeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild
Dingemanse, N. J., Both, C., Drent, P. J., van Oers, K., & van Noordwijk, A. J. (2002) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2006 · Cited by 819
Assessing the Cost of Mounting an Immune Response
Bonneaud, C., Mazuc, J., Gonzalez, G., Haussy, C., Chastel, O., Faivre, B., & Sorci, G. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/346134 · Cited by 566
Seasonal Variation in Local Recruitment of Great Tits: The Importance of Being Early
Verboven, N., & Visser, M. E. (1998) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546771 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Tinbergen, J. M., & Boerlijst, M. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1113
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.2307/5035
- OpenAlex
- W2326684360
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nestling Weight and Survival in Individual Great Tits (Parus major). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/5035
- The paper
- Tinbergen, J. M., & Boerlijst, M. C. (1990). Nestling Weight and Survival in Individual Great Tits (Parus major). The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/5035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.