Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nestling Weight and Survival in Individual Great Tits (Parus major)

Open access
Tinbergen, J. M., Boerlijst, M. C.·1990·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

(1) The aim of this paper is to estimate the shape of the curve relating first year survival to nestling weight in individual great tits (Parus major) and to study the causality of this relationship. (2) Data were collected in a mainland and an island population. Nestlings were weighed and sexed in the nest when 2 weeks old. A recapture programme provided data for recapture-rate estimates in the winter. Local survival until next breeding season was estimated by capturing the breeding population. Brood-size manipulation experiments were performed in the mainland population in order to manipulate nestling weights. (3) The relation between local recapture rate and nestling weight was described using logistic regression techniques. The descriptive model included positive weight and negative squared weight regression coefficients, if controlled for year, sex and date. Recapture rate approached zero at weights of c. 70% of the adult body weight. The curves for both populations showed an approximately linear part over a rather long range of weights. At high weights, the curve levelled off in the mainland population and curved down in the island population. (4) Survival from weighing till fledging and recapture rate from fledging till winter were related to nestling weight, but recapture rate from winter till breeding was not. (5) The effect of brood-size manipulation on nestling weight and subsequent recapture rate suggests causality of the recapture rate-nestling weight curve. Additional information from a comparison of the association between recapture rate and nestling weight within and between broods leads to the conclusion that weight does play a causal role in this relationship. Recapture rate-nestling weight curves can thus be estimated from non-experimental data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/5035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Tinbergen, J. M., & Boerlijst, M. C.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1990-10
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
1113
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2326684360
Cited by
456
References
1
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nestling Weight and Survival in Individual Great Tits (Parus major). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/5035
The paper
Tinbergen, J. M., & Boerlijst, M. C. (1990). Nestling Weight and Survival in Individual Great Tits (Parus major). The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/5035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.