The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arikamedu Reconsidered
Abstract
Reconsidered here are the chronology and significance of the important South Indian coastal site of Arikamedu, which was excavated by Sir Mortimer Wheeler in 1945 and Jean-Marie Casal in 1947-1950. Finds of fragmentary amphorae and Arretine ware in stratified contexts led Wheeler to identify the site as an Indo-Roman trading station, which he believed was founded during the time of Augustus and lasted for about two centuries. Even though subsequent investigations revealed conflicting evidence, Wheeler's basic interpretation has gone unchallenged until now; as a result it has become increasingly difficult to formulate a coherent picture of South Indian culture sequences during the Early Historical period. Reassessment of Wheeler's and Casal's material suggests that the date of the founding of Arikamedu should be pushed back to the middle of the third century B. C., while its first trade contacts with the Mediterranean world may have been established by the late second century B. C. The Arretine ware phase can now be dated more precisely to the first quarter of the first century A. C. (instead of the second quarter, as Wheeler had suggested); amphorae occur in substantially earlier levels, and Rouletted Ware in earlier levels still. Although the Arikamedu Rouletted Ware was probably manufactured locally, the technique of "rouletting" must have been introduced from the West, probably sometime in the second century B. C. Since Arikamedu thus seems to have functioned as a maritime…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rouletted Ware is unrelated to the monsoon trade with Roman-period Egypt.
“It is thus unrelated to the monsoon trade with Roman-period Egypt”
From Archaeology of Trade in the Western Indian Ocean, 300 BC–AD 700 (2014) · cites this paper as Begley 1983
Rouletted Ware developed out of regional traditions in South Asia, spanning back at least to the second century BC.
“It has since been shown to develop out of regional traditions in South Asia, spanning back at least to the second century BC.”
From Archaeology of Trade in the Western Indian Ocean, 300 BC–AD 700 (2014) · cites this paper as Begley 1983
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- The clearestevidencefora separatephaseisinCasal'sGroup, Ar.4 and4N, layers10, 10Aand11containmostly"Megalithic
- Kusumgar D.P., TataInstituteRadiocarbon Date list V,"Radiocarbon10 (1968) 131-43 (sampleno. TF-402
- Site urbainpl. 7
- Slightlyreviseddatesappearinhis twolater publications.In "RomanContact"(supran. 32) 257, he mentions 25-45 A.C
- 1980, 135-77
- Mahadevan I., 1973, Damilica, 2, 63
- 1947, CRAI, 107
- 1965, see IndArch 1964-1965, 25-26
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeology of Trade in the Western Indian Ocean, 300 BC–AD 700
Seland, E. H. (2014) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-014-9075-7 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Begley, V.
- Venue
- American Journal of Archaeology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1983-10-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 461-481
- ISSN
- 0002-9114
- 1939-828X
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review