The Relations between Egypt and the Land of Canaan during the Third Millennium B. C.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The chronological relationship between Egypt and the EBA southern Levant depends mainly upon the exchange of pottery that can be associated in Egypt with historically dated contexts, most of which are tombs.
“The chronological relationship between Egypt and the EBA southern Levant depends mainly upon the exchange of pottery that can be associated in Egypt with historically dated contexts, most of which are tombs”
From Chronology of the Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant: New Analysis for a High Chronology (2012) · cites this paper as Ben-Tor 1981
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chronology of the Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant: New Analysis for a High Chronology
Regev, J., De Miroschedji, P., Greenberg, R., Braun, E., Greenhut, Z., & Boaretto, E. (2012) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s003382220004724x · Cited by 209 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ben-Tor, A.
- Corresponding author
- Ben-Tor, Amnon
- Venue
- American Journal of Archaeology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1981-10-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-452
- ISSN
- 0002-9114 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-828X
- OpenAlex
- W2497199218
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Archaeology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Keywords
- 3rd millennium BC, ancient Near East, Egyptian foreign relations, Canaan, Late Bronze Age
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
