Cited by 240Rangeland and Wildlife ManagementWildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The Edge of the Range

Caughley, G., Grice, D., Barker, R., Brown, B.·1988·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/5092

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If density steps at a range boundary, the factor controlling the boundary's position is likely a substrate or physical barrier.

    “should density step at the range boundary, the factor controlling the position of the boundary is likely to be a substrate or physical barrier (Caughley et al. 1988).”

    From A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes (2015) · cites this paper as Caughley et al. 1988

  • A ramp effect can arise when a density attribute is low at the periphery and increases gradually toward the core of a species' distribution.

    “A ramp effect could occur if an attribute such as density is low at the periphery but rises progressively towards the core of distribution (Caughley et al. 1988).”

    From A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes (2015) · cites this paper as Caughley et al. 1988

  • In Manitoba, physical barriers such as lakes produce a steeper ramp or step effect.

    “where the presence of physical barriers (lakes) produces a steeper ramp, or 'step' effect (Caughley et al. 1988).”

    From A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes (2015) · cites this paper as Caughley et al. 1988

  • The negative relationship between coyote:fox ratio and distance from the southern boundary of wolf range is more consistent with a ramp effect from low wolf densities at the periphery than with other explanations.

    “However, the strong negative linear relationship between the coyote : fox ratios and distance to the southern edge of wolf distribution is more suggestive of a 'ramp' effect due to very low densities of wolves on the periphery of their distribution (Caughley et al. 1988).”

    From A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes (2015) · cites this paper as Caughley et al. 1988

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caughley, G., Grice, D., Barker, R., & Brown, B.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-10
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
771
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2333134698
Cited by
240
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Animal Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Park Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review