The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sex Differences in Motivations and Effects in Dating Violence
Abstract
Sex differences in motivations for and effects of dating violence are investigated using perceptions of both victims and perpetrators. A total of 495 college students (207 males and 288 females) completed a measure assessing motivation for and effects of dating violence, along with a social desirability measure, a state-trait anger expression inventory, a justification of relationship violence measure, and the Conflict Tactics Scale. Sex differences were evident in numerous motivations for and effects of dating violence and were also influenced by level of violence. Females were less likely to think force could be justifiable. Implications for the specific findings are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review
Archer, J. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651 · Cited by 2,507
Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization
Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4196-6 · Cited by 514
The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data
Dutton, D. G., & Nicholls, T. L. (2005) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.02.001 · Cited by 384
Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260503256656 · Cited by 324
Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.197 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. A.
- Venue
- Family Relations
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51
- ISSN
- 0197-6664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968614107
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Differences in Motivations and Effects in Dating Violence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/585658
- The paper
- Follingstad, D. R., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. A. (1991). Sex Differences in Motivations and Effects in Dating Violence. Family Relations. https://doi.org/10.2307/585658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
