The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Nature of Prejudice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Interpretation
Bonilla-Silva, E. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657316 · Cited by 2,760
The Continuing Significance of Race: Antiblack Discrimination in Public Places
Feagin, J. R. (1991) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095676 · Cited by 1,077
Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present, and the Future
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430203006001009 · Cited by 758
Attitudes Toward the Police: The Effects of Direct and Vicarious Experience
Rosenbaum, D. P., Schuck, A. M., Costello, S. K., Hawkins, D. F., & Ring, M. K. (2005) · Police Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1098611104271085 · Cited by 590
Longitudinal Benefit of Positive Self-Perceptions of Aging on Functional Health
Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., & Kasl, S. V. (2002) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/57.5.p409 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Sprott, W. J. H., & Allport, G. W.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1955-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 290
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2333424549
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nature of Prejudice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/586958
- The paper
- Sprott, W. J. H., & Allport, G. W. (1955). The Nature of Prejudice. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/586958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
