Cited by 638German Social Sciences and HistoryGenerational Differences and TrendsContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mannheim's Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy

Pilcher, Jane·1994·The British Journal of Sociology

Abstract

ABS'I'RAC'I' Mannheim's 1923 essay 'The Problem of Generations' has often been described as the seminal theoretical treatment of generations as a sociological phenomenon. Yet in practice scant attention has been paid to the sociology of generations by British sociologists. This is despite the notion of generation being widespread in everyday language as a way of understanding differences between age groups and as a means of locating individuals and groups within historical time. This paper aims to raise the profile of the sociology of generations within British sociology. It is shown that Mannheim's essay can be read as a text which contributes to our understanding of key sociological issues, in addition to 'the problem of generations'. These issues include the nature of time, the relationship between biology and the social, and socio-psychological connections of language and knowledge. The notion of generation is widely used in the everyday world to make sense of differences between age groupings in society and to locate individual selves and other persons within historical time. We speak, for example, of 'my generation' and of 'the older generation'. We describe those who grew up in, say, the 1960s, as belonging to 'the sixties generation'. We speak of 'a few generations ago', 'a new generation' and of 'the generation gap'. Despite the notion of generation being in such common currency, contemporary sociologists have paid scant attention to the significance of generation. Yet, a longstanding tradition of theorizing the nature and significance of biological age groupings for processes of social change and continuity can be traced back to the ancient Greek philosophers (Nash 1978). More recent contributions have come from Ortega y Gasset, with his notion of vigencias (Spitzer 1973) and from the French Annales school, via the concept of mentalities collectives (Esler 1984). However, it is Mannheim's (1952 [1923]) 'The Problem of Generations' which is

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/591659

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Pilcher, J.
Corresponding author
Pilcher, Jane
Venue
The British Journal of Sociology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-09
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
481
ISSN
0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312819572
Cited by
638
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German Social Sciences and History
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Keywords
sociology of generations, Karl Mannheim, British sociology, age groups, generational theory, nature of time, language and knowledge, social change, historical time, intergenerational differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mannheim's Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/591659
The paper
Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim's Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/591659