The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mannheim's Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy
Abstract
ABS'I'RAC'I' Mannheim's 1923 essay 'The Problem of Generations' has often been described as the seminal theoretical treatment of generations as a sociological phenomenon. Yet in practice scant attention has been paid to the sociology of generations by British sociologists. This is despite the notion of generation being widespread in everyday language as a way of understanding differences between age groups and as a means of locating individuals and groups within historical time. This paper aims to raise the profile of the sociology of generations within British sociology. It is shown that Mannheim's essay can be read as a text which contributes to our understanding of key sociological issues, in addition to 'the problem of generations'. These issues include the nature of time, the relationship between biology and the social, and socio-psychological connections of language and knowledge. The notion of generation is widely used in the everyday world to make sense of differences between age groupings in society and to locate individual selves and other persons within historical time. We speak, for example, of 'my generation' and of 'the older generation'. We describe those who grew up in, say, the 1960s, as belonging to 'the sixties generation'. We speak of 'a few generations ago', 'a new generation' and of 'the generation gap'. Despite the notion of generation being in such common currency, contemporary sociologists have paid scant attention to the significance of generation. Yet, a longstanding tradition of theorizing the nature and significance of biological age groupings for processes of social change and continuity can be traced back to the ancient Greek philosophers (Nash 1978). More recent contributions have come from Ortega y Gasset, with his notion of vigencias (Spitzer 1973) and from the French Annales school, via the concept of mentalities collectives (Esler 1984). However, it is Mannheim's (1952 [1923]) 'The Problem of Generations' which is
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The concept of “historical cohort” emphasises the historical experiences that members of a cohort share with one another and the impact of these experiences on the formation of their self-consciousness, identity, and worldview.”
From Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation? (2018) · cites this paper as Pilcher 1994
In the citing paper
“And it is through the stage narrative and performance that the voice of women and other disadvantaged groups have come to be expressed and heard.”
From Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation? (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“The Chinese versions of The Vagina Monologues break cultural taboos, candidly disclose widespread praxis of gender discrimination and inequality in Chinese society, and spotlight media bias in issues of gender, sex, and sexuality.”
From Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation? (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Young Feminist Activists in Present-Day China: A New Feminist Generation?
Wang, Q. (2018) · China Perspectives · doi:10.4000/chinaperspectives.8165 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Pilcher, J.
- Corresponding author
- Pilcher, Jane
- ORCID
- Pilcher, Jane
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 481
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2312819572
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › German Social Sciences and History
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- sociology of generations, Karl Mannheim, British sociology, age groups, generational theory, nature of time, language and knowledge, social change, historical time, intergenerational differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mannheim's Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/591659
- The paper
- Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim's Sociology of Generations: An Undervalued Legacy. The British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/591659