The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Notes on a Chinese Word for Jasmine
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Later works generally identify yeximing with suxin.
“Later works generally identify it with suxin 素馨 .84”
From The Mystery of Jasmine and the Arab Counting-House in Canton (2018) · cites this paper as Schafer 1948
The name yeximing fell out of use in Chinese during the Song period.
“The name yeximing fell out of use in Chinese during the Song period. Later works generally identify it with suxin 素馨 .84”
From The Mystery of Jasmine and the Arab Counting-House in Canton (2018) · cites this paper as Schafer 1948
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mystery of Jasmine and the Arab Counting-House in Canton
Haw, S. G. (2018) · Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft · doi:10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.168.2.0415 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Schafer, E. H.
- Corresponding author
- Schafer, Edward H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1948-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2320695394
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Names and Ethnobotany
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Keywords
- jasmine, Chinese vocabulary, word meaning, botanical terminology, Chinese language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
