The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The South Dravidian Languages
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Loss of liquids in LC clusters is reported for other Dravidian languages such as Kannada and Koḍagu (Emeneau 1967: 386, §3.13, 14), and Kota and Toda (Subrahmanyam 1971: 12-15, 116-24).”
From Viewing Proto-Dravidian from the Northeast (2021) · cites this paper as Emeneau 1967: 386, §3.13, 14
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Viewing Proto-Dravidian from the Northeast
Kobayashi, M. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0467
Metadata
- Authors
- Emeneau, M. B.
- Corresponding author
- Emeneau, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1967-10
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 365
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2322228325
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- Keywords
- Dravidian languages, language classification, linguistic typology, Dravidian linguistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
