The Archaeology of Palestine from the Neolithic through the Middle Bronze Age
Abstract
These three fascicules of CAH2 were written by two of the most distinguished figures in Near Eastern archaeology. Their surveys span a period of over 5000 years. The nature of the treatment of the various periods is examined and the general agreements which have been reached are summarized. Particular attention is paid, however, to the areas where problems exist. At critical junctions what may be termed minority viewpoints were adopted by the authors, even though eloquently expressed and defended in the literature. It seemed worth the effort, therefore, to discuss those areas in every period where alternate solutions to specific problems are not only possible, but are held by a variety of people. Some different viewpoints are defended on the basis of new data and bibliography. Among such problems are the sequence of cultures in the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods, how to interpret and label the material in the era leading up to the full urbanism of the third millennium, the chronology, data and terminology of the period between ca. 2300 and 1550 B.C., etc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The chronological relationship between Egypt and the EBA southern Levant depends mainly upon the exchange of pottery that can be associated in Egypt with historically dated contexts, most of which are tombs.
“The chronological relationship between Egypt and the EBA southern Levant depends mainly upon the exchange of pottery that can be associated in Egypt with historically dated contexts, most of which are tombs”
From Chronology of the Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant: New Analysis for a High Chronology (2012) · cites this paper as Wright 1971
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chronology of the Early Bronze Age in the Southern Levant: New Analysis for a High Chronology
Regev, J., De Miroschedji, P., Greenberg, R., Braun, E., Greenhut, Z., & Boaretto, E. (2012) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s003382220004724x · Cited by 209 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wright, G. E.
- Corresponding author
- Wright, G. Ernest
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1971-04
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 276
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334227892
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2012: 2
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Keywords
- Palestine archaeology, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Middle Bronze Age, Near Eastern archaeology, cultural chronology, cultural sequence, urbanization, 3rd millennium BC, terminology, chronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review