The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Medieval Arabic Ṭarsh: A Forgotten Chapter in the History of Printing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bulliet inclines toward an independent invention of printing in the Middle East, and bravely suggests that Islamic printing technologies may have influenced the development of printing in Europe.”
From Gilding Textiles and Printing Blocks in Tenth-Century Egypt (2021) · cites this paper as Bulliet 1987: 435-36
In the citing paper
“As Richard Bulliet has shown, the ṭarsh were blocks for printing amulets.”
From Gilding Textiles and Printing Blocks in Tenth-Century Egypt (2021) · cites this paper as Bulliet 1987: 430
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gilding Textiles and Printing Blocks in Tenth-Century Egypt
King, A. H. (2021) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.2.0455 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulliet, R. W.
- Corresponding author
- Bulliet, Richard W.
- ORCID
- Bulliet, Richard W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321813322
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval History and Crusades
- Keywords
- Arabic printing, medieval Arabic manuscripts, printing history, Arabic script, manuscript illumination, Islamic book culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
