Cited by 468Study and Philosophy of ReligionMedieval Philosophy and TheologyMedieval and Classical Philosophy

Mystical Languages of Unsaying

Nettler, Ronald L., Sells, Michael A.·1995·Journal of the American Oriental Society

Abstract

This text examines a mode of mystical discourse, apophasis, which literally means speaking away. Sometimes translated as apophatic discourse embraces the impossibility of naming something that is ineffable by continually turning back upon its own propositions and names. In this study of apophasis in Greek, Christian and Islamic texts, Michael Sells offers a sustained, critical account of how apophatic language works, the conventions, logic, and paradoxes it employs, and the dilemmas encountered in any attempt to analyze it. This book includes readings of the most rigorously apophatic texts of Plotinus, John the Scot Eriugena, Ibn Arabi, Marguerite Porete, and Meister Eckhart, with comparative reference to important apophatic writers in the Jewish tradition, such as Abraham Abulafia and Moses de Leon. Sells reveals essential common features in the writings of these authors, despite their wide-ranging differences in era, tradition and theology. By showing how apophasis works as a mode of discourse rather than as a negative theology, this work aims to open the subject up for re-evaluation. Sells demonstrates that the more radical claims of apophatic writers - claims that critics have often dismissed as hyperbolic or condemned as pantheistic or nihilistic - are vital to an adequate account of the mystical languages of unsaying. This work also has implications for the relationship of classical apophasis to contemporary languages of the unsayable. Sells challenges many widely circu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/606227

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such a meaning event is not about a particular thing that can be defined or abstracted (a 'what'); rather, it is a repeated process in which the gaze is continually drawn away from the 'what,' eschewing any and all attempts at definition and reification.

    “Such a meaning event is not about a particular thing that can be defined or abstracted (a 'what'); rather, it is a repeated process in which the gaze is continually drawn away from the 'what,' eschewing any and all attempts at definition and reification (Sells 1994, 215).”
  • While it may not entail the dramatic apparition of visionary or miraculous phenomena, this shift is the intimation of what Michael Sells has termed a 'meaning event,' one in which searching and its inbuilt dichotomizing tendencies give way to a recognition that there is nothing to see or to search for.

    “while it may not entail the dramatic apparition of visionary or miraculous phenomena, this shift is the intimation of what Michael Sells has termed a 'meaning event,' one in which searching and its inbuilt dichotomizing tendencies give way to a recognition that there is nothing to see or to search for (DPG 317.1 in Esler 2023, 102-3).”
  • To conceptualize such a spiralling idea of the path, we must combine directional hierarchies with a more basic sense of absolute equality and identity, which keeps the hierarchies from becoming too rigid.

    “In order to conceptualize such a spiralling idea of the path, we must combine directional [10] hierarchies-which are envisioned in terms of relative space and time and allow for spatial, moral and intellectual distinctions (i.e., the stages on the path)-with a more basic sense of absolute equality and identity, which keeps the hierarchies from becoming too rigid (Sells 1994, 213).”
  • The Dzogchen attitude is somewhat similar to that of Christian mystics Meister Eckhart and Marguerite Porete, who taught that virtuous deeds are pointless as an end in themselves but led active lives and would have regarded forceful cessation of activity as wilful action symptomatic of spiritual pride.

    “Despite their radically different doctrinal backgrounds, the Dzogchen attitude is somewhat similar to that of the Christian mystics Meister Eckhart (ca.1260-ca.1328) and Marguerite Porete (d.1310), who both taught that virtuous deeds are pointless as an end in themselves but led active lives and would have regarded the forceful cessation of activity as a form of wilful action that is itself”

Authors
Nettler, R. L., & Sells, M. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1995-07
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
484
ISSN
0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026703034
Cited by
468
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 44
FWCI
23.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval Philosophy and Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Keywords
apophasis, ineffability, mystical language, Plotinus, Ibn Arabi, Marguerite Porete, Meister Eckhart, Abraham Abulafia, negative theology, medieval mysticism, deconstruction, pantheism, ancient Greek philosophy, Christian mysticism, Sufism, Jewish mysticism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review