The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Context Clues Are Unreliable Predictors of Word Meanings
Abstract
THREE STUDIES were conducted to determine the extent to which context helps students infer the meanings of unknown words. In Experiment 1, students in Grades 10 and 11 were randomly assigned to either a context or a no-context condition. The no-context group read lowfrequency words in isolation. The context group read the same words embedded in passages taken from novels. Experiment 2 was a repeated-measures study in which 39 students in Grade 11 read sets of words in isolation and also in passages taken from four different content areas. Experiment 3 was a systematic replication of Experiment 1 in which subjects were required to write definitions for the low-frequency words instead of choosing the definitions in a multiple-choice format. In none of the three experiments was there any statistically significant effect due to the context: t(99) = .552, p > .10; F(1, 38) = .227, p > .10; and t(83) = -.29, p > .10, respectively. The conclusion is drawn that instructional strategies that prioritize context clues should be reexamined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747758 · Cited by 1,249
Cited by
Stanovich, K. E. (1986) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.21.4.1 · Cited by 5,222
Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition
Share, D. L. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 · Cited by 2,352
We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis
KRASHEN, S. (1989) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x · Cited by 1,274
Learning Word Meanings From Context During Normal Reading
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312024002237 · Cited by 757
Incidental Word Learning While Reading: A Meta-Analysis
Swanborn, M. S. L., & de Glopper, K. (1999) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543069003261 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Schatz, E. K., & Baldwin, R. S.
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076460227
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Context Clues Are Unreliable Predictors of Word Meanings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/747615
- The paper
- Schatz, E. K., & Baldwin, R. S. (1986). Context Clues Are Unreliable Predictors of Word Meanings. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/747615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
