The displacement effect: assessing the relation between television viewing and reading performance
Abstract
TELEVISION'S implications for reading performance and school achievement are examined within the framework of the displacement hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that watching television may affect students' reading achievement by displacing other activities crucial to the development of reading skills, such as leisure reading. A synthesis of eight statewide reading assessments and a secondary analysis of the 1984 National Assessment of Educational Progress, which included measures of scholastic achievement, out-of-school activities, and reported television viewing exposure, are used to analyze four theories of displacement: that television displaces activities with functional similarity, activities in physical and psychological proximity, marginal fringe activities, and activities that have become less appealing due to reorganization of the child's functional needs with age. Results indicate that the differences in reading scores for those students watching 2-4 hours per day are small, but that beyond 4 hours of viewing, the effects are negative and increasingly more deleterious. Analysis of outside activities suggests that television viewing is tied to a different set of needs and gratifications than leisure reading, sports, or spending time with friends. Small but negative relations are reported between television viewing and homework activities. For the vast majority of children, however, time spent television viewing is tempered by the increasing demands of schooling and the onset of social activities as children grow older.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to the displacement hypothesis, time previously devoted to print reading may just be replaced by time devoted to digital reading.
“According to the displacement hypothesis (Neuman, 1988), this is because time previously devoted to print reading may just be replaced by time devoted to digital reading.”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Neuman, 1988
Smartphones influence well-being by replacing other activities (the displacement hypothesis).
“According to the displacement hypothesis [16], screen time-regardless of whether it is on a desktop, TV, or phone-influences psychological outcomes by replacing other activities (c.f., Bowling Alone ; [17]).”
From The effects of smartphones on well-being: theoretical integration and research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 238
- Authors
- Neuman, S. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- Corresponding author
- Neuman, Susan B.
- ORCID
- Neuman, Susan B.
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 414
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065888403
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 17.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reading Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- television viewing, reading achievement, displacement theory, reading for pleasure, academic performance, children's time use, homework, National Assessment of Educational Progress, reading assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review