Cited by 238Literacy and Educational PracticesChild Development and Digital TechnologyReading and Literacy Development

The displacement effect: assessing the relation between television viewing and reading performance

Neuman, Susan B.·1988·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

TELEVISION'S implications for reading performance and school achievement are examined within the framework of the displacement hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that watching television may affect students' reading achievement by displacing other activities crucial to the development of reading skills, such as leisure reading. A synthesis of eight statewide reading assessments and a secondary analysis of the 1984 National Assessment of Educational Progress, which included measures of scholastic achievement, out-of-school activities, and reported television viewing exposure, are used to analyze four theories of displacement: that television displaces activities with functional similarity, activities in physical and psychological proximity, marginal fringe activities, and activities that have become less appealing due to reorganization of the child's functional needs with age. Results indicate that the differences in reading scores for those students watching 2-4 hours per day are small, but that beyond 4 hours of viewing, the effects are negative and increasingly more deleterious. Analysis of outside activities suggests that television viewing is tied to a different set of needs and gratifications than leisure reading, sports, or spending time with friends. Small but negative relations are reported between television viewing and homework activities. For the vast majority of children, however, time spent television viewing is tempered by the increasing demands of schooling and the onset of social activities as children grow older.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/747641

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 238

Authors
Neuman, S. B.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
Corresponding author
Neuman, Susan B.
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
414
ISSN
0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065888403
Cited by
238
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
television viewing, reading achievement, displacement theory, reading for pleasure, academic performance, children's time use, homework, National Assessment of Educational Progress, reading assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review