The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Initial Fraction Learning by Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students: A Comparison of the Effects of Using Commercial Curricula with the Effects of Using the Rational Number Project Curriculum
Abstract
This study contrasted the achievement of students using either commercial curricula (CC) for initial fraction learning with the achievement of students using the Rational Number Project (RNP) fraction curriculum. The RNP curriculum placed particular emphasis on the use of multiple physical models and translations within and between modes of representation-pictorial, manipulative, verbal, real-world, and symbolic. The instructional program lasted 28-30 days and involved over 1600 fourth and fifth graders in 66 classrooms that were randomly assigned to treatment groups. Students using RNP project materials had statistically higher mean scores on the posttest and retention test and on four (of six) subscales: concepts, order, transfer, and estimation. Interview data showed differences in the quality of students' thinking as they solved order and estimation tasks involving fractions. RNP students approached such tasks conceptually by building on their constructed mental images of fractions, whereas CC students relied more often on standard, often rote, procedures when solving identical fraction tasks. These results are consistent with earlier RNP work with smaller numbers of students in several teaching experiment settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308317473 · Cited by 407
Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks: Which dimension should we interleave?
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.003 · Cited by 67
Byrne, E. M., Jensen, H., Thomsen, B. S., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3400 · Cited by 43
(2015) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.22318/cscl2015.363 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & delMas, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111
- ISSN
- 0021-8251 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004057930
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Initial Fraction Learning by Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students: A Comparison of the Effects of Using Commercial Curricula with the Effects of Using the Rational Number Project Curriculum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/749646
- The paper
- Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & delMas, R. C. (2002). Initial Fraction Learning by Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students: A Comparison of the Effects of Using Commercial Curricula with the Effects of Using the Rational Number Project Curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/749646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.