The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Repression of the Political Emigre. The Underground to International Law: A Proposal for Remedy
Open accessAbstract
This article identifies an underground to international law consisting in part of harassment of and even attacks on, and assassinations of, emigres or their attorneys. In addition to its clear violation of domestic laws, this underground operates contrary to several international legal norms: the fundamental principle of territorial sovereignty that restricts the reach of the police forces of one sovereign into the territorial jurisdiction of another; the long standing recognition of rights of emigration; and recently developed and now widely accepted human rights principles. This article proposes an avenue of redress for political emigres residing in the United States who are attacked by agents from their nation of citizenship. It argues that civil process in the United States federal courts provides the greatest promise for an effective remedy and that the remedy should be provided through the development of a statute-based federal common law of international tort - specifically an international tort of emigre repression. It further discusses the problems and practicalities of litigation to implement this tort remedy. The article concludes that the international tort model provides a basis for remedy that can develop through the common law, and yet, by relying upon international law as the source of standards for defining the delict, avoids the parochialism that is characteristically the failing of domestic adjudication as an instrument of international legal order. The int…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of authoritarian strategies to target political exiles and activists in the diaspora can extend into the space of liberal democratic states.
“The use of authoritarian strategies to target political exiles and activists in the diaspora can extend into the space of liberal democratic states (Garvey 1980).”
From Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics (2020) · cites this paper as Garvey 1980
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Garvey, J. I.
- Affiliations
- University of San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garvey, Jack I.
- Venue
- The Yale Law Journal
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1980-11
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78
- ISSN
- 0044-0094 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2275459140
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- core.ac.uk
- Locations
- The Yale Law Journal (publishedVersion)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
- Social Sciences › Law › Immigration Law and Human Rights
- Keywords
- political emigration, federal common law, territorial sovereignty, human rights, state immunity, United States federal courts, US foreign policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review