Cited by 6International Law and Human RightsConflict of Laws and JurisdictionImmigration Law and Human Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Repression of the Political Emigre. The Underground to International Law: A Proposal for Remedy

Open access
Garvey, Jack I.·1980·The Yale Law Journal

Abstract

This article identifies an underground to international law consisting in part of harassment of and even attacks on, and assassinations of, emigres or their attorneys. In addition to its clear violation of domestic laws, this underground operates contrary to several international legal norms: the fundamental principle of territorial sovereignty that restricts the reach of the police forces of one sovereign into the territorial jurisdiction of another; the long standing recognition of rights of emigration; and recently developed and now widely accepted human rights principles. This article proposes an avenue of redress for political emigres residing in the United States who are attacked by agents from their nation of citizenship. It argues that civil process in the United States federal courts provides the greatest promise for an effective remedy and that the remedy should be provided through the development of a statute-based federal common law of international tort - specifically an international tort of emigre repression. It further discusses the problems and practicalities of litigation to implement this tort remedy. The article concludes that the international tort model provides a basis for remedy that can develop through the common law, and yet, by relying upon international law as the source of standards for defining the delict, avoids the parochialism that is characteristically the failing of domestic adjudication as an instrument of international legal order. The int…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/795858

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of authoritarian strategies to target political exiles and activists in the diaspora can extend into the space of liberal democratic states.

    “The use of authoritarian strategies to target political exiles and activists in the diaspora can extend into the space of liberal democratic states (Garvey 1980).”

    From Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics (2020) · cites this paper as Garvey 1980

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 6

Metadata

Authors
Garvey, J. I.
Affiliations
University of San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Garvey, Jack I.
Venue
The Yale Law Journal
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1980-11
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
78
ISSN
0044-0094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2275459140
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Yale Law Journal (publishedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Law › Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
  • Social Sciences › Law › Immigration Law and Human Rights
Keywords
political emigration, federal common law, territorial sovereignty, human rights, state immunity, United States federal courts, US foreign policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review