The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On an Actual Virtual Servo-Mechanism for Guessing Bad News: A Single Case Conjecture
Abstract
A conversation analytic treatment of a single episode of talk-in-interaction is used to sketch a mechanism for steering recipients of bad news to better guesses of what the news is. The account of the mechanism makes use of the notion of “preferred/dispreferred response” and distinguishes different usages of that notion. The results of the exploration are used to recommend an approach to specialized contexts in which bad news is communicated, as well as an approach to “specialized” talk more generally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413107 · Cited by 5,150
Self-citation
Cited by
Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2 · Cited by 2,726
The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250506800103 · Cited by 1,748
Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action
Schegloff, E. A. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230911 · Cited by 1,161
Self-citationContingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting
Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351810802028613 · Cited by 802
Co-Constructing Meaning in Conversations With an Aphasie Man
Goodwin, C. (1995) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Schegloff, E. A.
- Venue
- Social Problems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 442-457
- ISSN
- 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8533
- OpenAlex
- W2021645172
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
