The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Extended Body of Christ: Three Dimensions of Deep Incarnation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deep incarnation presupposes a radical embodiment that reaches into the roots of material and biological existence as well as into the darker sides of creation.
“Deep incarnation thus presupposes a radical embodiment that reaches into in the roots ( radices ) of material and biological existence as well as into the darker sides of creation: the tenebrae creationis .”
From Deep incarnation: From deep history to post-axial religion (2016) · cites this paper as Gregersen 2015a:225-226
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep incarnation: From deep history to post-axial religion
Gregersen, N. H. (2016) · HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies · doi:10.4102/hts.v72i4.3428 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregersen, N. H.
- Corresponding author
- Gregersen, Niels Henrik
- Venue
- Incarnation
- Publisher
- Fortress Press
- Published
- 2015-07-10
- Pages
- 225-252
- OpenAlex
- W3045166691
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fortress Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious and Theological Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Christian Theology and Mission
- Keywords
- body of Christ, ecclesiology, church, Christology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
