The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Out of the Cloister: Literati Perspectives on Buddhism in Sung China, 960–1279
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Regardless of their personal views, however, China's scholar-officials supervised all of the country's religious institutions and maintained close connections between the government and the temples (see, e.g., Halperin 2006; Griffith Foulk 1993; Huang 1999).”
From Originating in Emptiness, Present Everywhere: Representations of Song Dynasty (960-1279) Buddhist Bells in their Inscriptions (2020) · cites this paper as Halperin 2006
In the citing paper
“During the Song, Buddhism”
From Originating in Emptiness, Present Everywhere: Representations of Song Dynasty (960-1279) Buddhist Bells in their Inscriptions (2020) · cites this paper as Halperin 2006
In the citing paper
“In addition, the aim of inscribing the commemoration in stone was to grant the text an unusual degree of permanence (see Halperin 2006: 17-20).”
From Originating in Emptiness, Present Everywhere: Representations of Song Dynasty (960-1279) Buddhist Bells in their Inscriptions (2020) · cites this paper as Halperin 2006
In the citing paper
“The author of this inscription, Mu Xiu, was a strong advocate of the Classical Prose (guwen 古文) movement, which viewed Buddhism as an unwelcome influence on indigenous culture (Welter 1999: 25, 27; Halperin 2006: 7).”
From Originating in Emptiness, Present Everywhere: Representations of Song Dynasty (960-1279) Buddhist Bells in their Inscriptions (2020) · cites this paper as Halperin 2006: 7
In the citing paper
“In describing the attitude of Song-dynasty literati-lay Buddhists, Halperin coined the term “worldly devotion” (Halperin 2006, p. 4), referring to a mode of spiritual engagement grounded primarily in textual immersion and the affective pleasure it produced-standing in complementary contrast to devotional faith or ritualistic practice.”
From Scriptural Exegesis and Doctrinal Authority in Late Ming Buddhism: The Śūraṅgama Sūtra, Literati Interpretation, and Huayan Doctrinal Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Halperin 2006, p. 4
Citations
Cited by
Letting the Troops Loose: Pillage, Massacres, and Enslavement in Early Tang Warfare
Yang, S.-Y. (2017) · Journal of Chinese Military History · doi:10.1163/22127453-12341307 · Cited by 12
Portrayals of chan buddhism in the literature of internal alchemy
Capitanio, J. (2015) · Journal of Chinese Religions · doi:10.1179/0737769x15z.00000000022 · Cited by 8
Sokolova, A. (2021) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel12040253 · Cited by 2
A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought
Barrett, T. H. (2018) · Studies in Chinese Religions · doi:10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776
Burdorf, S. (2020) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · doi:10.2143/jiabs.43.0.3289051
Metadata
- Authors
- Halperin, M.
- Corresponding author
- Halperin, Mark
- Venue
- Harvard University Asia Center eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Asia Center
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- OpenAlex
- W4210242865
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 16 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Asia Center eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medieval Literature and History
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Out of the Cloister: Literati Perspectives on Buddhism in Sung China, 960–1279. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/j.ctt1tm7fwp
- The paper
- Halperin, M. (2006). Out of the Cloister: Literati Perspectives on Buddhism in Sung China, 960–1279. Harvard University Asia Center eBooks. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1tm7fwp
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
