The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Backfire Online: Studying Reactions to the Repression of Internet Activism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, some have argued that when information control strategies are used, this may draw other digitally active individuals and groups into protest (141, 184), representing a backfire effect.”
From Physical and virtual repertoires of contention (2022) · cites this paper as [184]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Earl, J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abl8198 · Cited by 250
Self-citationRepression in the Digital Age: Surveillance, Censorship, and the Dynamics of State Violence
Gohdes, A. R. (2024) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197743577.001.0001 · Cited by 59
Nationwide shutdowns and government offensives
Gohdes, A. R. (2024) · Repression in the Digital Age · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197743577.003.0005
Metadata
- Authors
- Beyer, J. L., & Earl, J.
- Venue
- The Paradox of Repression and Nonviolent Movements
- Publisher
- Syracuse University Press
- Published
- 2018-05-15
- Pages
- 102-142
- OpenAlex
- W4250506127
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 15 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Syracuse University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
