The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Digital Demagogue: Authoritarian Capitalism in the Age of Trump and Twitter
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
La inconsciencia de la acción de mirar el móvil es en sí misma una forma de canalización de la atención mucho más sofisticada e interiorizada dentro del mecanismo neuronal y emocional del ser humano.
“La propia inconsciencia de la acción de mirar el móvil es en sí misma una forma de canalización de la atención mucho más sofisticada e interiorizada dentro del propio mecanismo de funcionamiento neuronal y emocional del ser humano ( Fuchs , 2018; Sunstein , 2017):”
From Redes sociales y consumo digital en jóvenes universitarios: economía de la atención y oligopolios de la comunicación en el siglo XXI (2020) · cites this paper as Fuchs, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giraldo-Luque, S., & Fernández-Rovira, C. (2020) · El profesional de la información · doi:10.3145/epi.2020.sep.28 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, C.
- Corresponding author
- Fuchs, Christian
- ORCID
- Fuchs, Christian
- Venue
- Pluto Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Pluto Press
- Published
- 2018-02-20
- OpenAlex
- W4242258846
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 15.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pluto Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- populism, digital media, political communication, social media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
