Radiocarbon Dating Iron Age Gordion, and the Early Phrygian Destruction in Particular
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work has demonstrated a very good correlation between sophisticated 14C dating and standard historical Egyptian chronology through the 2nd millennium BC.
“and recent work has instead demonstrated a very good correlation between sophisticated 14 C dating and standard historical Egyptian chronology through the 2nd millennium BC (Bronk Ramsey et al. 2010;Manning et al. 2012).”
From Considerations of the Scale of Radiocarbon Offsets in the East Mediterranean, and Considering a Case for the Latest (Most Recent) Likely Date for the Santorini Eruption (2012) · cites this paper as Manning et al. 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Manning, S. W., & Kromer, B. (2012) · Radiocarbon · doi:10.1017/s0033822200047202 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Manning, S. W., & Kromer, B.
- Venue
- The New Chronology of Iron Age Gordion
- Publisher
- University of Pennsylvania Museum
- Published
- 2012-05-28
- Pages
- 123-153
- OpenAlex
- W2491593663
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Keywords
- radiocarbon dating, Iron Age, Gordion, Phrygia, chronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
