Embracing Watershed Politics
Open accessAbstract
In Embracing Watershed Politics, political scientists Edella Schlager and William Blomquist provide timely illustrations and thought-provoking explanations of why political considerations are essential, unavoidable, and in some ways even desirable elements of decision making about water and watersheds. With decades of combined study of water management in the United States, they focus on the many contending interests and communities found in America's watersheds, the fundamental dimensions of decision making, and the impacts of science, complexity, and uncertainty on watershed management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increasing diversity in participation may have undesired consequences, such as generating higher levels of conflict and eroding principled engagement.
“It should be noted that increasing diversity in participation may have undesired consequences as well.In some situations, more diversity can generate higher levels of conflict and erode principled engagement, whereas in other situations, less diversity can lead to different, though not necessarily inferior actions and accomplishments (Korfmacher 2000;Schlager and Blomquist 2008;Steelman and Carmin”
From An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance (2012) · cites this paper as Schlager and Blomquist 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W.
- Venue
- University Press of Colorado eBooks
- Publisher
- University Press of Colorado
- Published
- 2008-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W4302043525
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- University Press of Colorado eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Colorado Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Digital Collections of Colorado (Colorado State University) (submittedVersion)
- OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental Science and Water Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
- Keywords
- water management, watershed management, political decision-making, stakeholder interests, science and politics, uncertainty, complexity, water governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
