Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A proof against the possibility that the computer can support a macro complex with high Φ was possible under IIT 3.0 [116].
“While we do not yet have a formal proof against this possibility under IIT 4.0, such a proof was possible under IIT 3.0 [116]”
From Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness (2024) · cites this paper as [116]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy
Clarke, B., Gillies, D., Illari, P., Russo, F., & Williamson, J. (2014) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-013-9220-9 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
General theory of topological explanations and explanatory asymmetry
Kostić, D. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0321 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Scientific explanation: A critical survey
Schurz, G. (1995) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/bf00145406 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness
Findlay, G., Marshall, W., Albantakis, L., David, I., Mayner, W. G., Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04571 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nomological Deductive Reasoning for Trustworthy, Human-Readable, and Actionable AI Outputs
Hakizimana, G., & Ledezma Espino, A. (2025) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a18060306 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Salmon, W. C.
- Corresponding author
- Salmon, Wesley C.
- Venue
- University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Pittsburgh Press
- Published
- 1971-09-15
- OpenAlex
- W4245048552
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 29.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis
- Keywords
- statistical explanation, explanation, statistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
