Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-Creation in Education positions education as both site and method for rethinking AI futures-imagining oral interface models that respect ceremonial protocols or AI systems mediating land-based pedagogy under Indigenous governance.
“Co-Creation in Education: positions education as both site and method for rethinking AI futuresimagining oral interface models that respect ceremonial protocols or AI systems mediating landbased pedagogy under Indigenous governance (Lewis et al., 2024;Simpson, 2014).”
From Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings (2026) · cites this paper as Simpson, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings
Mbah, M. F., & Jarvis, L. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2626631 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Simpson, A.
- Corresponding author
- Simpson, Audra
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2014
- OpenAlex
- W4248081838
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- Mohawk, Iroquois
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
