CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Race, History, and American SocietyAfrican cultural and philosophical studiesAfro-Latin American Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Building Maroon Intellectual Communities

Finley, Chris·2020·Otherwise Worlds
DOI 10.2307/j.ctv11sn1vd.23
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In April 2015, I attended a colloquium at the University of California at Riverside about settler colonialism and anti-Blackness, which is where many of the chapters in this anthology were first presented. I did not like a lot of what was said in Riverside because I could only compare what I heard with what I already knew and felt was true in relation to Indigenous studies. I also was not presenting a paper so I did not feel vulnerable or invested like other attendees of the colloquium. In other words, I liked the ideas of the scholars I was already

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/9781478012023-024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Finley, C.
Corresponding author
Finley, Chris
Venue
Otherwise Worlds
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2020
Pages
362-369
DOI
10.2307/j.ctv11sn1vd.23
OpenAlex
W4252891164
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › African cultural and philosophical studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
Keywords
maroon communities, intellectual community, community building, indigenous knowledge, Afro-descendant communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review